Those of us who are introverts tend to be individualist by nature: do not follow the crowd, think for ourselves and prefer validation for our novel ways of living. We don’t make most decisions based on what is trendy or popular or based on what the group believes is the only way to find creative solutions, achieve some goal or reach consensus on an issue.
Susan Cain, author of “Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World The Can’t Stop Talking” addresses the idea of collaboration in Chapter 3 When Collaboration Kills Creativity. She uses “The New Groupthink” to describe the way many institutions are organized. Schools and workplaces now organize people into groups or teams believing that creativity and productivity comes from a sociable i.e. extroverted place. Research shows that the opposite is true: the world’s greatest thinkers have often worked in solitude. Psychologists Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (author of “Flow”) and Gregory Feist suggest the most creative people in many fields are introverts because introverts are very comfortable spending time alone: solitude being a crucial and undervalued ingredient for creativity. Susan Cain provides several examples quoting Malcolm Gladwell, “Innovation – the heart of the knowledge economy – is fundamentally social”: “None of us is as smart as all of us” Warren Bennis, in his book “Organizing Genius” : and “Many jobs that we regard as the province of a single mind actually require a crowd” by Clay Shirkey in “Here Comes Everybody”. Apparently, some gung-ho team work advocates have even claimed the painting of the Sistine Chapel was a group effort and only completed because Michelangelo’s assistants worked on it, too. The assistants were ‘apprentices’ and would have worked on small parts of the Sistine Chapel under strict supervision. Michelangelo did the vast majority of the painting, no one else did. Wonder what Michelangelo would think of the claim the Sistine Chapel was a team effort?
Groups abound in society as humans have a tendency to form into groups. There certain features of a group:
- favour your own group because it’s advantageous to yourself
- protection of self by protecting others like yourself
- imposes unwritten rules upon members of the group, with the expectation that individual members will be loyal and conform or face consequences such as expulsion and/or blackballing
- warp or exaggerate our decisions
- dull or stifle creativity
- favour members of a group over others
- look for a leader to worship
- fight other groups and/or individuals for supremacy
- look for a leader to ‘worship’
I cannot speak for other introverts but none of the attributes of belonging to a group seem positive or remotely appeal. Maybe there are groups which do not share most of these attributes that are perceived as cult-like or cliquey by me. This introvert does not get the ‘need’ to belong to a group, to think collectively rather than as an individual. LOL The groups I’ve encountered have been very negative experiences, mostly because my introverted characteristics were totally at odds with most or all of the above characteristics. Likely, I am not alone.